Urban Forest Management Plan Presentation and Workshop

Using input from the community, several environmental groups and developers, the City has drafted an Urban Forest Management Plan that includes 21 recommendations to protect and promote a diverse and sustainable urban forest over the next 20 years.

Community members are invited to review, discuss and provide feedback about Guelph’s draft Urban Forest Management Plan before finalizing the plan and presenting it to the City’s Planning, Building, Engineering and Environment Committee later this year.

Tuesday, April 17
6 – 8.30 p.m.
Meeting Room C, City Hall, 1 Carden St.

Please RSVP with the City to Michelle Mercier (Clerical Assistant) at michelle.mercier@guelph.ca.

If you can not attend, please feel free to send comments to rory.templeton@guelph.ca. We look forward to your participation.

For more information check out the City of Guelph website HERE.

Guelph’s Urban Forestry Plan Still In Planning
Rob O’Flanagan, Guelph Mercury
February 22, 2012

GUELPH — Much has been done on paper, but as yet those emerging paper plans haven’t been shaped into action on the ground when it comes to Guelph’s ambitious urban forestry management plan.

The city’s planning and building, engineering and environment committee voted to receive a report from consultants Urban Forest Innovations Incorporated and Beacon Environmental on Tuesday. The vote keeps the planning process in motion.

A vision of Guelph covered in a sprawling green canopy, and a plan to make that happen, has now been in the works for five years, and the canopy has not expanded over that time – in fact, it has shrunk.

The plan, with a proposed start-up in 2013, calls for a coordinated, multi-departmental effort to plant more trees, protect and care for existing trees, and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on new personnel and equipment to nearly double the city’s tree cover within the next 20 years.

Back in 2007, the city’s strategic plan outlined a grand goal to be the most forested community of its size in the country, with a 40 per cent tree cover by 2020. At Tuesday’s meeting, Mayor Karen Farbridge conceded the target date is likely not achievable and should probably be amended.

Currently about 20 per cent of the city is forested, and with severe storms in the summer months – like one last year that toppled hundreds of trees throughout the community – and the recognized threat of the Emerald Ash Borer and other invasive, tree-destroying species, the existing canopy is under threat.

A $30,000 tree canopy study released in January estimated the coverage at 20 per cent, and found that the city’s natural wooded areas had shrunk by 46 hectares since 2009. Last month, Farbridge reasserted the goal to “have the highest tree canopy coverage among comparable communities.”

According to the Urban Forest Stewardship Network, urban areas in Canada are about 19 per cent forested.

In its report to the committee on Tuesday, the consultants outlined the many goals of the urban forestry management plan, including the establishment of a more comprehensive tree inventory program, consistent monitoring of the urban forest, fostering a “tree friendly” culture in the community, and identifying and utilizing “all plantable spots” in the city.

The proposed plan includes 21 recommendations, including the creation of a senior urban forester position, and the formation of an internal interdepartmental ‘tree team’ to oversee plans and find solutions.

Beacon Environmental planning ecologist Margot Ursic said the city’s current staffing and resource allocations are inadequate to move the city forward on the plan. The report recommends an expenditure of $520,000 in the first year – $400,000 for 4.5 full time equivalent positions, $100,000 for studies and $20,000 for education and promotional costs. It also recommends capital expenditures of $138,000 in the first year for new rooting technologies and forestry equipment.

The presence of the Emerald Ash Borer has been confirmed in Guelph, and the report states that the Ash-destroying insect “will quickly spread and kill the Ash tree population.” An Emerald Ash Borer strategy is needed immediately.

During discussion at the meeting, Todd Salter, Guelph’s acting general manager, said a strategy is currently being worked on, with an annual $400,000-$500,000 in funding in the capital budget for the problem. A report and action plan is expected in April. The problem is assisting with the funding.

Ursic said during Tuesday’s presentation to the committee, that Guelph has no mechanism in place that identifies trees as an important asset in the city, nor one that tracks municipal tree removals and plantings.

She is recommending a public tree by-law that would apply the same protective standards that govern private trees.

A stakeholder meeting and public open house will be scheduled and city staff will report back to council with a final recommended plan later this year.

PRESS RELEASE

GUELPH, ON, January 27, 2012 — Tree canopy coverage in Guelph is estimated to be 20 per cent according to a 2011 study commissioned by the City with support from TD Green Streets.

The baseline study, which was conducted by Urban Forest Innovations Inc. and Beacon Environmental, found the City’s tree canopy coverage to be higher in older, low-density residential areas as well as medium-density residential areas and on estate lots. The study also concluded tree canopy coverage tends to be lower in commercial and industrial areas and along arterial, collector roads and the Hanlon Expressway.

“The City of Guelph’s goal is to have the highest tree canopy coverage among comparable communities,” says Mayor Karen Farbridge. “This study provides us with a current understanding of the City’s tree canopy coverage and will help us make decisions regarding maintaining and enhancing Guelph’s urban forest.”

City staff will use the study’s findings to help develop the City’s Urban Forest Management Plan this spring.

Guelph was one of 23 municipalities across Canada to receive a $15,000 grant from TD Green Streets, which was matched by the City. The $30,000 paid for the tree canopy coverage study and to launch an Adopt-a-Tree Program last fall, which resulted in about 300 new trees on residential properties and 190 new trees in City parks.

For more information, visit guelph.ca/trees.

The following article was on the BBC News website last week. Its definitely worth repeating. Its clear that Guelph is not the only city dealing with a drastic decrease in its mature tree canopy.

Calls To Green The ‘Concrete Jungle’
Mark Kinver, Science and environment reporter, BBC News
June 30, 2010

Trees can play an essential role in improving the quality of life in UK towns and cities, a report has said.

The Woodland Trust says planting more trees has been shown to improve air quality, reduce ambient temperatures and benefit people’s health.The trend of declining tree cover in many areas needs to be reversed in order to improve access to green spaces in urban areas, the study adds. The trust is also launching a campaign to plant 20 million native trees each year.

“Towns and cities tend to put into sharp relief some of the key problems we are facing as a society,” said lead author Mike Townsend. “So they are a good place to start when try to illustrate just where green spaces can deliver significant improvements for relatively little cost.”

The issues outlined in the report included physical and mental health problems, childhood obesity, air pollution, soaring summer temperatures, flash flooding and diminishing wildlife.

The trust estimated that 80% of the UK population live in urban areas, yet less than 10% of people have access to local woodlands within 500m of their homes.

“If you look back over history, Victorian times saw a real move towards parks and street trees; some of the big street trees that you find in our cities today go back to these times,” explained Woodland Trust conservation policy expert Sian Atkinson.

“What we have seen more recently is that there has been reduction in the number of trees being planted, and there has also been a loss of the lovely Victorian trees with big canopies,” she told BBC News.

“We are starting to miss these from our towns and cities, and not enough thought has been given to replacements and to ensuring that there is going to be enough tree cover in the future.”

‘Slow the flow’
The report also highlighted the role urban trees could play in preventing flash floods.

Ms Atkinson said: “Hard surfaces in towns and cities have increased in recent years, and we are seeing more flooding. One of the problems is surface water drainage. It has been shown that trees and woods are key to help control this sort of flooding. As well as absorbing groundwater, tree canopies help reduce the volume of rainfall hitting the ground and relieve pressure on urban drainage systems.”

She called on civic planners to address the issues highlighted by the report.

“There is quite a lot of talk about green infrastructure,” she observed, “and our message is that we hope that trees and woods are a really big part of that.”

In its Programme for Government report, the coalition government announced that it would initiate a national tree planting campaign.

During a speech in May, Environment Secretary Caroline Spelman said: “If any organism has demonstrated an ability to multi-task, it’s trees. They capture carbon and hold soils together, prevent flooding and help control our climate. They also add immeasurably to the quality of life of our towns and cities.”

She added that in some parts of inner London, it was calculated that each tree was deemed to be worth as much as £78,000 in terms of its benefits.

Ms Atkinson welcomed the government’s announcement: “The UK has very low woodland cover compared with the rest of Europe. We are actually looking for a doubling in native woodland cover. There are some areas that have more cover than others, but – overall – there is quite a big job to do in order to increase tree cover to a level that provides all the benefits outlined in the report.”

To coincide with the publication of the report, the Woodland Trust is also launching a More Trees More Good campaign, which will look to plant 20 million native trees across the UK for the next 50 years.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Guelph’s urban forest canopy sits at 25%, while the desired level is 40%. Guelph citizens have now been waiting for a new stronger protective tree by-law for over 19 years. In the meantime we continue to lose canopy.

Guelph Urban Forest Friends have been advocating for our urban trees, including a strong protective tree bylaw and a separate urban forestry department with a certified forester to more effectively manage tree maintenance and coordinate public education on the value of our mature trees.

Please contact Mayor and Council about this issue. Tell them that our mature urban trees need their help and support. Tell them to get the Strategic Urban Forestry Management Plan completed and a strong and comprehensive protective bylaw passed.

Contacting Guelph City Council

Mayor Farbridge: mayor@guelph.ca

Ward 1: Bob Bell bob.bell@guelph.ca, Kathleen Farrelly kathleen.farrelly@guelph.ca
Ward 2: Vicki Beard vicki.beard@guelph.ca, Ian Findlay ian.findlay@guelph.ca
Ward 3: Maggie Laidlaw maggie.laidlaw@guelph.ca, June Hofland june.hofland@guelph.ca
Ward 4: Gloria Kovach gloria.kovach@guelph.ca, Mike Salisbury mike.salisbury@guelph.ca
Ward 5: Lise Burcher lise.burcher@guelph.ca, Leanne Piper leanne.piper@guelph.ca
Ward 6: Christine Billings christine.billings@guelph.ca, Karl Wettstein karl.wettstein@guelph.ca

Don’t know your ward? Click here to see the map.

Clear-cutting on Victoria Road, June 2009

Hello GUFF supporters,

The City has drafted a tree bylaw and is holding workshops for discussion and input:  The next workshop is on June 8, from 7-9 p.m. in Conference Room C at City Hall. We urge you to attend or provide written comments by June 18.

Guelph Urban Forest Friends (GUFF) has reviewed the draft tree bylaw.  It is an improvement over the existing 25-year-old bylaw and requires that permits be obtained for destroying trees over 20 cm in diameter on small properties and trees over 10 cm in diameter on large properties.  Even so, it is still much weaker than some other tree by-laws in Ontario.  There are a number of areas that need to be stronger:

1. The foundation of the bylaw should be that healthy trees of a certain size should be protected.  The City of Toronto bylaw states this clearly:  “The Commissioner shall not issue a permit for the injury or destruction of trees where trees are healthy.”  813-15C.

Admittedly, the Toronto bylaw does allow exemptions for the destruction of healthy trees under certain circumstances–such as when they are within the building envelope of a proposed building.  But the importance of an affirmative policy protecting healthy trees cannot be underestimated.

2. The draft Guelph bylaw gives too much discretion in deciding whether to issue a permit to destroy trees.   A city inspector would have to “consider” such things as whether the tree is an endangered species, the condition and location of the tree, whether it is important for erosion and flood control, whether there are breeding birds present. Instead, the by-law should contain a section entitled “PERMIT REFUSED” that itemizes reasons for which a permit must be denied.

Those reasons should include:  that the tree is an endangered or threatened species; that the tree is healthy; that environmentally sensitive areas will not be adequately protected; that erosion or flood control will be negatively impacted; that significant vistas will not be protected and preserved; that the tree is a heritage tree; that removing the tree would violate the Migratory Bird Act.  Such language is consistent with the Toronto and Richmond Hill tree bylaws.

3. Guelph’s tree bylaw should include mandatory parameters for issuing permits for destroying trees.  As in #2 above, the draft by-law gives too much discretion in imposing the conditions on the permit.  The bylaw only requires that the “inspector may make the Permit subject to such conditions as the Inspector may consider necessary. “The Inspector “may” require replacement trees; the inspector “may” require cash in lieu of tree replacement; the inspector “may” require that specific measures be implemented to mitigate effects on nearby trees, land, water bodies or natural areas.”

The Toronto tree bylaw, in contrast, states that “A permit to destroy trees SHALL be subject to the following terms and conditions:”  Those conditions include such things as tree replacement and cash in lieu.

4. Guelph’s draft tree bylaw should require that whenever trees are proposed to be removed, impacts to surrounding properties (such as loss of shade, vistas or privacy) have to be considered.  This is consistent with a provision in the Richmond Hill tree bylaw.

To summarize, the draft bylaw should:

  • state that, except for certain exemptions, permits shall not be issued to destroy healthy trees over 20 cm in diameter (10 cm on large properties)
  • itemize reasons for which permits must be denied (e.g. trees are healthy, endangered, of heritage quality, etc.)
  • establish mandatory conditions for obtaining a permit to destroy trees (e.g. replacement trees must be planted)
  • require that impacts on adjoining properties be considered (e.g. loss of shade, privacy)

Thanks from GUFF

About the draft Tree Bylaw
In addition to regulating trees 10 centimetres at breast height on lots larger than 0.2 hectares (0.5 acres), the updated draft bylaw proposes to regulate damage or removal of larger trees on smaller properties; trees 20 centimetres in diameter at breast height on lots less than 0.2 hectares (0.5 acres). The updated draft also includes a permit process, a list of exemptions, entry and inspection powers, enforcement measures and increased fines.Following a presentation, participants will have an opportunity to discuss issues and provide feedback.

Even if you can’t attend the sessions, you can still comment. Comments will be received until June 18.

Suzanne Young, Environmental Planner
519-837-5616 x 2356
suzanne.young@guelph.ca

Jessica McEachren, Environmental Planner
519-837-5616 x 2563
jessica.mceachren@guelph.ca

Contacting Guelph City Council

Mayor Farbridge: mayor@guelph.ca

Ward 1: Bob Bell bob.bell@guelph.ca, Kathleen Farrelly kathleen.farrelly@guelph.ca
Ward 2: Vicki Beard vicki.beard@guelph.ca, Ian Findlay ian.findlay@guelph.ca
Ward 3: Maggie Laidlaw maggie.laidlaw@guelph.ca, June Hofland june.hofland@guelph.ca
Ward 4: Gloria Kovach gloria.kovach@guelph.ca, Mike Salisbury mike.salisbury@guelph.ca
Ward 5: Lise Burcher lise.burcher@guelph.ca, Leanne Piper leanne.piper@guelph.ca
Ward 6: Christine Billings christine.billings@guelph.ca, Karl Wettstein karl.wettstein@guelph.ca

Don’t know your ward? Click here to see the map

The fear of falling trees and tree-limbs can lead to massive expenditures on defensive tree management and unwarranted, irrational culling of trees.

Experts say one of the greatest threats to veteran (old) trees is misunderstanding (Read 2000).  Many have been cut down as they were thought of as dying, diseased and dangerous.

Those who study veteran trees know that they naturally shed branches, which helps to relieve the pressure on declining root and leaf systems and helps the tree maintain stability.

Trees may last for centuries in this way, and this final stage can be the longest in a tree’s life.  Pruning some limbs from these trees will usually make them safe (Corney 2007).

In the UK, the Health and Safety Executive, in charge of establishing safety guidelines, has determined that the risk of someone being killed by a tree in a public place is about 1 in 20 million.  (HSE 2007).

Compare that with the odds of being killed in a terrorist attack (1:650,000) or the risk of being killed by lightening (1:1 million) (CBC; Environment Canada).

A common risk analysis model suggests that the risk of death of 1:10,000 is unacceptable, while the risk of death of 1:1 million is broadly acceptable.  Taken in this context, the risk from trees is miniscule.

We desperately need a tree risk management strategy based upon reasonable risk control.

The unquestionable and significant benefits of mature trees must be factored into this strategy.

Want to learn more about how we should be looking after our veteran trees?

Check out the Biodiversity Action Plan For Veteran Trees on sites affiliated with the The Caravan Club (UK) by Just Ecology.

View The Biodiversity Action Plan For Veteran Trees

Guelph Urban Forest Friends have been advocating for our urban trees, including a stronger protective tree bylaw and a separate urban forestry department with a certified forester to more effectively manage tree maintenance and coordinate public education on the value of our mature trees.

Please contact Mayor and Council about this issue.

Tell them to get the Strategic Urban Forestry Management Plan completed and a strong and comprehensive protective bylaw passed. Let them know that the protection and management of our urban forest will be an election issue this October.

Contacting Guelph City Council

Mayor Farbridge: mayor@guelph.ca

Ward 1: Bob Bell bob.bell@guelph.ca, Kathleen Farrelly kathleen.farrelly@guelph.ca
Ward 2: Vicki Beard vicki.beard@guelph.ca, Ian Findlay ian.findlay@guelph.ca
Ward 3: Maggie Laidlaw maggie.laidlaw@guelph.ca, June Hofland june.hofland@guelph.ca
Ward 4: Gloria Kovach gloria.kovach@guelph.ca, Mike Salisbury mike.salisbury@guelph.ca
Ward 5: Lise Burcher lise.burcher@guelph.ca, Leanne Piper leanne.piper@guelph.ca
Ward 6: Christine Billings christine.billings@guelph.ca, Karl Wettstein karl.wettstein@guelph.ca

Don’t know your ward? Click here to see the map

On January 25, CBC Radio 1′s Ontario Today’s Gardening Phone-in with Ed Lawrence focused on the management of urban trees and the need for stronger by-laws to protect them.

Guelph activist Diane Hurst was not only able to call in to talk to Ed, she also managed to get us a copy of the audio to put up on the website.

Well done, Diane! 

Listen to the segment:


A Large Urban Elm Tree

Guelph citizens have now been waiting for a new stronger protective tree by-law for over 19 years. In the meantime we continue to lose canopy.

Guelph’s urban forest canopy sits at 25%, while the desired level  is 40%.

Guelph Urban Forest Friends have been advocating for our urban trees, including a stronger protective tree bylaw and a separate urban forestry department with a certified forester to more effectively manage tree maintenance and coordinate public education on the value of our mature trees.

If you feel strongly about this issue, please contact Mayor and Council.

Tell them to get the Strategic Urban Forestry Management Plan completed and a strong protective bylaw passed. Let them know that the protection and management of our urban forest will be an election issue this October.

Contacting Guelph City Council

Mayor Farbridge: mayor@guelph.ca

Ward 1: Bob Bell bob.bell@guelph.ca, Kathleen Farrelly kathleen.farrelly@guelph.ca
Ward 2: Vicki Beard vicki.beard@guelph.ca, Ian Findlay ian.findlay@guelph.ca
Ward 3: Maggie Laidlaw maggie.laidlaw@guelph.ca, June Hofland june.hofland@guelph.ca
Ward 4: Gloria Kovach gloria.kovach@guelph.ca, Mike Salisbury mike.salisbury@guelph.ca
Ward 5: Lise Burcher lise.burcher@guelph.ca, Leanne Piper leanne.piper@guelph.ca
Ward 6: Christine Billings christine.billings@guelph.ca, Karl Wettstein karl.wettstein@guelph.ca

Don’t know your ward? Click here to see the map

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.